Your letters: PM's suit, rewilding and a poignant 1945 RAF Cosford picture


From politics to the countryside, readers have their say on the issues making headlines
Whip round to buy PM a suit
Bambi Burnham appears to have thought he'd got on the plane for a round of golf (maybe to Scotland). Instead, wearing his smart Northern Lad casuals and polo shirt, he arrives in Ukraine.
Now, I'm not one of those stuffy blokes who insist that one should never leave the house without a suit and tie, and I guess over the past few decades, I could count on a couple of hands the number of times I've worn a suit. But then I'm not Bambi, the Prime Minister of Great Britain. Could the reason be simple? Burnham may have missed out on all the freebies the rest of his mates have enjoyed and can't afford a suit.
Should I organise a whip-round? Or I might pop to the charity shop and, given chest, waist and inside leg measurements, for about eight quid, I’ll get him a cracker.
Alan M Etheridge, Sedgley
Rewilding not always best
Roger Norton appears to have a chip on his shoulder regarding “sporting gentlemen”, maybe he should have some chips with his grouse and whinberry pie?
Seriously though, it is true to say that “muirburning” is the traditional way of controlling heather and gorse on miles of Scottish hillside, because as he says, it was to rejuvenate them for the wildlife to eat and nest in.
He doesn’t seem to like the idea of eating the grouse, but that isn’t a reason to stop the controlled burning, it clearly kept the wildfires at bay, so the principle is a good one.
The ‘scientific evidence’ which he supports is heavily influenced by groups with other agendas, like the RSPB who will do anything for birds, and the Wildlife Trusts and the Environment Agency who will do anything to re-wild the countryside by “natural” means. The recent devastating, uncontrollable wildfires should be a wake-up call to the re-wilders, that nature doesn’t always know what’s best. Listen to those who have the experience, is my suggestion.
R Allen, Midlands
We must deal with old trees
As one who has planted thousands of trees over the years, I agree with Mike Crump that shade trees are a good thing, but they must not pose a threat to life.
In recent times there have been many tragic instances of people being killed by large old trees, including a young boy playing in a public park, when one fell on him without warning. There are plenty of fast growing trees with slender trunks and a good spread of leaf that could replace those which are a danger.
W Kerswell, Picklescott
Have an opinion? We want to hear from you.
Share your views by writing to Readers’ Letters at [email protected].
Letters to the editor must include the writer’s name and address. Letters will only be published anonymously in exceptional circumstances. The editor reserves the right to edit letters for length, clarity or style.
Do you have a picture from the past to share?
We would love to hear from you. Whether you have an old photograph, need help identifying a street or recognise a familiar face, send your images to [email protected].
Please include your name, where you are from and as much information as possible about the photograph. We will publish as many as we can online and in print.
Comment Guidelines
Iconic Media encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.