Political opinion: An open letter ahead of the vote on assisted dying
When we are elected to Parliament, we make promises. It is vital that we govern to with openness, honesty, and transparency—even when facing the most difficult of decisions. The upcoming vote on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, more commonly known as the Assisted Dying Bill, is undoubtedly one of those moments.
At this point, after months of deliberation, debate, and reflection, I am minded to vote against the Bill.
Firstly, it’s important to remind people that this is a Private Member’s Bill—brought forward not by the Government, but by an individual MP, passionate about the issue. It will also be a free vote, allowing MPs to vote according to conscience, not party lines.
That makes this an exceptionally important vote.
This is, without doubt, an emotive issue—one which will mean so much to so many people. Over the months, I’ve heard from many hundreds of residents across Wolverhampton North East. The overwhelming majority have asked me to vote against the Bill. I want to thank everyone who took the time to share their views. Your engagement reflects the best of our democracy, and I am truly grateful.
Alongside those conversations, I’ve also heard from medical professionals, hospice staff, doctors, nurses, carers, disability advocates, charities and other experts. These discussions have informed my view and deepened my concerns.
I do not believe the safeguards currently outlined in the Bill are strong enough. I worry that vulnerable people—those living with disabilities or facing financial difficulties given a terminal diagnosis—may feel pressure, whether real or perceived, to make a decision they wouldn’t otherwise choose. Some may feel like a burden. Others might face subtle coercion. I am not satisfied that the protections go far enough to prevent this.
I also worry about the mental wellbeing of healthcare professionals involved—directly or indirectly—and the emotional toll on families, particularly where there may be disagreement over the decision.
While I respect the intention behind the Bill and acknowledge the compassion at its core, I remain deeply concerned about the current state of our National Health Service, social care, and palliative services. These systems are already stretched. Before we consider new pathways, we must first strengthen the care and support we already have.
That is why I will continue to advocate for better hospice care, improved access to palliative support, and stronger health and social care services. Until that happens, I do not believe this is the right time to proceed with such legislation.
I want to sincerely thank Kim Leadbeater MP for bringing this Bill forward. She has shown great courage and conviction, and it is right that MPs raise issues they feel passionately about. These discussions lie at the heart of our democracy.
However, based on the Bill in its current form, I cannot support it. That said, I will attend the debate and listen carefully—as I have throughout. My thoughts are not fixed. I will continue to consider the views of my constituents right up to the moment I cast my vote. If you live in Wolverhampton North East and wish to share your thoughts or experiences, I encourage you to do so.
