Trump, Xi and Putin plan unprecedented joint meeting at Apec, White House says

The leaders of the United States, China and Russia plan to meet on Thursday on the sidelines of next week’s Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (Apec) summit in China’s tech hub of Shenzhen – an unprecedented gathering of the heads of the world’s biggest nuclear powers.

While the leaders’ gathering for joint talks will mark a singular moment, analysts say expectations are low that the talks will lead to major breakthroughs and say they will be heavier in symbolism than substance.

Plans for the three-way summit with Donald Trump, Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin were confirmed on Friday by the White House. It comes at a complicated moment in relations between the three countries.

Mr Trump has warmly embraced Mr Xi after coming to a truce in their short-lived trade war last year and in spite of differences over the US war with Iran and other tensions between the world’s foremost economic powers.

Similarly, the US leader has sought to build his relationship with Mr Putin, even as the Russian president persists with his nearly five-year-old war with Ukraine and as Moscow deepened its military, intelligence and diplomatic partnership with Iran.

The US president has insisted that such a meeting would provide an opportunity for the three leaders to discuss the US war with Iran and his goal of reaching a three-way agreement on their nuclear arms stockpiles.

Mr Trump does plan on discussing the Iran war with Mr Xi and Mr Putin, but will steer away from discussing Ukraine, according to a senior official.

The last nuclear arms pact between Russia and the United States expired in February, removing caps on the two largest atomic arsenals for the first time in more than a half-century. When that treaty – known as New Start – expired, Mr Trump rejected a call by Russia to extend the two-country deal for another year and called for “a new, improved and modernised” accord that includes China.

The trilateral meeting is intended to serve as the “beginning of hopefully a conversation” on nuclear disarmament “that can be productive going forward”, said a US official, who added that no agreements are expected to be announced.

But Beijing’s arsenal of more than 600 warheads, according to Pentagon estimates, is far smaller than inventories held by the US and Russia, each estimated to have more than 5,000 warheads. With US and Russian arsenals dwarfing its stockpile, China has shown little interest in developing a nuclear pact.

Trump administration officials acknowledge that the nuclear stockpile issue is a difficult one for Beijing to engage on, but the US official characterised the meeting as the moment for China to “step up … to the adult table” on a matter of international importance.

By agreeing to host the meeting, Mr Xi may be calculating that the moment offers him an opportunity to flex China’s growing clout and prestige.

For the Kremlin, the planned trilateral meeting is a coveted chance to posture as a superpower on par with Washington and Beijing.

“I think the key for Putin was that this was very much about signalling a desire to talk to the president and talk to Chairman Xi in a way that suggests that they’re making decisions on Ukraine, which obviously the Ukrainians and the Europeans don’t like,” said Edgard Kagan, a former US ambassador to Malaysia who is now at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies.

The trilateral could very well overshadow the Apec summit. The talks, which will bring 21 economies to Shenzhen, mark a big moment for China to show off its fast-growing, ultra-modern coastal metropolis that transformed from a small fishing village into a global technology and economic hub in just a few decades.

More substantively, such a gathering could also muddy China’s argument that a Cold War mentality in the West was a contributing factor that led to Russia’s war on Ukraine and its pointed criticism that the US has undermined international institutions and treaties with how it has executed its war against Iran.

The trilateral meeting could undercut China’s push to portray itself as a defender of free trade at Apec, said Hoo Tiang Boon, a professor of Chinese foreign policy at Nanyang Technological University.

“You sort of run counter to Chinese support of multilateralism,” he said.

Mr Putin and Mr Xi have fostered a close personal relationship, meeting more than 40 times since Mr Xi became president in 2013 and addressing each other as “dear friend”.

Mr Trump and Mr Putin have met face-to-face on seven different occasions, most recently in Alaska in August 2025. Mr Xi and Mr Trump have held face-to-face talks on eight occasions, including a September state visit to Washington by the Chinese leader.

Beijing is the number one trading partner for Moscow, a relationship that has strengthened since Mr Putin sent troops into Ukraine in 2022.

As the EU and the West sought to economically isolate Russia, China increased its purchases of Russia’s energy resources and became Moscow’s principal supplier of key technologies, including high-tech components for Russian weapons industries. Beijing has ignored Western demands to cut those supplies.

In the lead-up to Russia’s war on Ukraine, Mr Xi and Mr Putin declared their countries had a “no-limits friendship”. China officially has said it is neutral on the conflict, while charging that Kyiv’s Western allies played a part in provoking Russia’s military action in Ukraine.

Moscow, in turn, has repeatedly declared its support for Beijing’s policy on issues related to Taiwan.

Mr Trump recently struck a diesel deal with Russia, waiving sanctions against Moscow and allowing for the sale of millions of tons of the fuel. The US leader has blamed surging energy prices on Ukraine’s attacks on Russian oil refineries. Analysts, however, say the rise in global crude prices is due mostly to the Iran war.

Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky has expressed concern that the trilateral meeting could serve as a platform for discussing a possible Ukraine deal behind Kyiv’s back.

Planning for the summit has drawn comparisons to the Yalta Conference, the 1945 gathering at which the leaders of the US, Britain and the Soviet Union agreed to divide Germany and Berlin into four military occupation zones and finalized plans for establishing the United Nations.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has dismissed the Yalta comparisons, noting that any potential agreements reached in Shenzhen cannot be enforced on others.

“It’s clear that a meeting between the leaders of countries such as Russia, China and the United States is extremely significant,” Mr Peskov said.

“However, let’s not forget that the vision for a global order is that no-one tries to impose any particular view of global order, and it should be based entirely on mutual benefit and mutual respect.”