Russia cannot attack Nato soon but plans to boost forces – intelligence chief

Russia cannot launch an attack on Nato this year or next but is planning to increase its forces significantly along the alliance’s eastern flank, depending on the outcome of the war in Ukraine, a senior European intelligence official said.

Speaking in an online briefing with journalists, Kaupo Rosin, the head of Estonia’s foreign intelligence service, also told The Associated Press that Russian President Vladimir Putin currently has no desire to halt the nearly four-year-old invasion of neighbouring Ukraine and thinks he can “outsmart” the United States during talks on how to end the war.

Mr Rosin said Russia’s plan involves creating new military units and multiplying the pre-war force along its border with Nato by two to three times.

But that will be heavily influenced by the outcome of discussions involving Moscow, Washington and Kyiv regarding a cessation of hostilities in Ukraine, he said.

That is because Russia will need to maintain a “significant portion” of its military inside occupied Ukraine and in Russia to prevent future Ukrainian action, he said.

Currently there are “not enough resources available” for Moscow to launch an attack on Nato, but the Kremlin is concerned about Europe rearming and being able to conduct military action against Russia in the next couple of years, the intelligence chief said.

Russian officials, meanwhile, are playing for time in the talks with Washington and “there is absolutely no discussion about how to really co-operate with the US in a meaningful way,” Mr Rosin said.

Mr Rosin spoke to reporters ahead of the publication of Estonia’s annual security report on Tuesday.

He said the information on how the Kremlin views the talks with the US is based on intelligence that Nato member Estonia gathered from “Russian internal discussions”.

He did not elaborate on how the information was obtained but said the discussions showed that Russian officials believe Washington remains Moscow’s “main enemy”.

Russian officials have insisted publicly they want a negotiated deal but have shown little willingness to compromise and remain adamant their demands must be met.

US-brokered talks between envoys from Russia and Ukraine in recent weeks have been described by officials from both sides as constructive and positive, but there has been no sign of any progress on key issues in the discussions.

Mr Putin, “in his head, still thinks that he can actually militarily win (in Ukraine) at some point”, Mr Rosin said.

A White House official responded to the Estonian intelligence chief’s comments and said President Donald Trump’s negotiators had made “tremendous progress” on the talks to end the war.

Although prisoner exchanges have happened sporadically since May, they pointed in particular to a recent agreement in Abu Dhabi reached by the US, Ukraine and Russia to release more than 300 prisoners.

That agreement was evidence that efforts to end the war are advancing, said the official, who was granted anonymity because they did not have permission to speak publicly.

In an indication that Mr Trump wants to accelerate the momentum of those efforts, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said last week that Washington has given Kyiv and Moscow a June deadline to reach a settlement.

Mr Trump over the past year has set several deadlines that have come and gone without apparent consequences.

Fiona Hill, a British-American Russia expert and adviser to Mr Trump in his first term, said Mr Trump and his officials are spinning a story that depicts the US president as a peacemaker and, for that reason, they are not interested in changing their assessment that Mr Putin wants to end the war.

She told the AP that both leaders “need their version of events to play out” and are hanging onto their version of the truth – Mr Putin as the victor in Ukraine and Mr Trump as the dealmaker.

On Tuesday morning, Russian planes dropped seven powerful glide bombs on Sloviansk, in the Donetsk region of eastern Ukraine, killing an 11-year-old girl and her mother, according to regional chief Vadym Filashkin.

He said 16 others, including a seven-year-old girl, were injured in the attack that damaged 14 apartment blocks.

During the night, Russian drone attacks elsewhere in Ukraine wounded at least five people, including a toddler and two other children, regional authorities said.

Although Mr Trump has repeatedly suggested that Mr Putin wants peace, he has sometimes appeared frustrated with the Russian leader’s lukewarm approach to talks.

From an intelligence perspective, Mr Rosin said he does not know why US officials believe Mr Putin wants to end the war.

Ms Hill, who served as a national intelligence officer under previous US administrations, said it is unclear what intelligence information Mr Trump gets on Russia — or if he reads it.

He relies heavily on his lead negotiators, special envoy Steve Witkoff and son-in-law Jared Kushner, who Ms Hill said may struggle to believe that the damage to the Russian economy from the war is a price Mr Putin is willing to pay for Ukraine.

Referring to reports that Mr Witkoff has attended meetings with Mr Putin without a US State Department translator, she questioned if Mr Trump’s envoys understood what was being said in meetings and suggested officials may be “selectively” looking for what they want to hear.

Mr Putin is fixated on controlling all of Ukraine and the idea “is so deep in his head” that it takes priority over anything else, including the economy, Mr Rosin said, suggesting the conflict will continue in some form for several years.

He said Mr Putin’s position may change only if the situation in Russia, or on the front line, becomes “catastrophic,” threatening his power. For now, the Kremlin leader still believes he can take Ukraine and “outsmart everybody”, Mr Rosin said.

One reason Mr Putin thinks he can win militarily in Ukraine is because he is “definitely” getting some incorrect information from his officials, the Estonian intelligence chief said.

Not all Russian officials, however, believe they are winning the war in Ukraine, Mr Rosin said.

“The lower you go in the food chain,” the more people understand “how bad it is actually on the ground”, he said, whereas higher-level officials are more optimistic because they are given more positive reports.

Mr Rosin cited examples of officials being told Russian forces had captured Ukrainian settlements when that was not true.

The reports that arrive at Mr Putin’s desk may be “much more optimistic” than the situation on the ground because Mr Putin only wants to see success, Mr Rosin said.

Ms Hill said both Mr Trump and Mr Putin are probably being told what they want to hear by people who want to please them.