Pensions, transport and the Budget - your letters, plus a 1978 Willenhall footbridge under construction


Readers debate pensions, call for better transport and share their thoughts on the Government’s approach to security and the Budget
Pensions reflect a bleak Britain
A recent national debate, as well as discussions on these letter pages, has centred around the provision of pensions in the United Kingdom.
The controversy intensified following Mr Burnham's decision to abolish the triple lock, a move that has elicited vigorous opposition from many quarters. Alan Harrison expressed his dissent from a left-leaning perspective in a letter, and I must concur with his scepticism about this policy.
Pensions in the UK are considerably less generous than those in many other nations. The reality is that pension provision has been in terminal decline since Mr Gordon Brown revoked the enhanced corporation tax relief on dividends paid by UK pension funds.
This policy effectively led to the termination of final-salary schemes and to the withdrawal of approximately £100 billion from UK pension schemes. Consequently, many companies have reverted to less generous pension arrangements, leaving pensioners dependent on the modest state pension.
With the discontinuation of the triple lock, pensioners will face increased financial hardship despite a lifetime of work and contributions.
While I recognise the fiscal implications of maintaining the triple lock, I find it difficult to justify further deteriorating the living conditions of pensioners. The UK pension system is, admittedly, in disarray, relying heavily on the current working generation to fund today's retirees’ pensions.
The policies introduced by Mr Gordon Brown have led to long-term adverse effects, with economic growth per capita remaining sluggish and UK productivity stagnating at levels comparable to those of 2007. Unemployed individuals exceed nine million, with over six million of these being of working age.
The country appears to have exhausted its financial resources, rendering all governmental decisions inherently challenging and accompanied by adverse repercussions for various groups.
The United Kingdom is, in per capita terms, a relatively impoverished nation, and its economic condition is increasingly deteriorating. A fundamental change in policy direction is imperative to improve this bleak outlook.
Martin Bristow, Midlands
Thugs will be getting bail
Those who seek to cause mayhem on British streets, whether hired thugs here or their paymasters overseas, will meet an unflinching response’ — like being let out on bail I suppose.
Alan Jones, Halesowen
Give shires fair deal on transport
There is, currently, a consultation on Shropshire's Transport Plan for the period 2027-2037.
This is required by the Government for each area of the country and it provides an opportunity for people to input into this, either on-line on Shropshire Council's website, or at face to face consultations happening around the county.
It will be an important document as it should express the opinions of people on all transport provision, not just public transport which has always been an issue in the county. The lion's share of government transport funding has consistently gone to the metro boroughs and those regions like the Black Country with mayors, whilst shire counties like Shropshire have been left in the wilderness.
Andy Burnham understood the importance of good transport in Greater Manchester and has promised to do the same elsewhere, as PM, with ‘growth in every postcode’. There was also the pledge of a ‘Bus Revolution’ in Labour’s Manifesto at the last General Election.
It is time regions outside the conurbations, like Shropshire, got their own good transport links and also links to those areas where people can access onward rail, metro and bus journeys, even Birmingham Airport if you live in the south of the county.
The consultation is open and its results will be a test of Burnham’s resolve...
Mike Crump, Bridgnorth
Norbert’s help on the Budget
By the bells and baubles of Santa, just like Xmas, the yearly Government Budget is talked about and worried about earlier and earlier in the year.
The Budget, not due until 28/10, seems to have been mumbled about ever since that buccaneer of the political high seas, Capt'n Andy O'Burnt-Ham, jumped ship from The Jolly Roger of Manchester and landed on the deck of HMS UK and took charge.
Well, worry no more. Uncle Norbert and I are here to help you survive the Pre-Budget, The Actual Budget and The Aftermath.
Pre-Budget. Ignore everything from the Government. They will hint at a severe Budget in the hope we are all relieved on Budget day instead of things being disastrous, they are just doom-laden. But start stuffing your mattress with cash.
The Actual Budget: Keep a sharp lookout in the small print for any special taxes on mattresses. The Aftermath: Buy another mattress.
Peter Steggles, Rushbury
- You can enjoy other pictures from the past and more with our weekly FREE Nostalgia Newsletter - with scores of archive pictures and exclusive features on the history of Wolverhampton, Staffordshire and the Black Country - all sent to your inbox every week. Sign up here.
Have an opinion? We want to hear from you.
Share your views by writing to Readers’ Letters at [email protected].
Letters to the editor must include the writer’s name and address. Letters will only be published anonymously in exceptional circumstances. The editor reserves the right to edit letters for length, clarity or style.
Do you have a picture from the past to share?
We would love to hear from you. Whether you have an old photograph, need help identifying a street or recognise a familiar face, send your images to [email protected].
Please include your name, where you are from and as much information as possible about the photograph. We will publish as many as we can online and in print.
Comment Guidelines
Iconic Media encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.