NEW: Why Wolves still have FFP concerns

In a summer fraught with challenges, Wolves have a financial minefield to navigate.

placeholder image

In one camp we have Julen Lopetegui, who is rightly calling for the right tools to do his job, and in the other camp we have Fosun, Wolves chairman Jeff Shi and a financial department attempting to find the right pieces to a very confusing puzzle.

The Premier League’s profit and sustainability rules mean a club can not make more than a £105million loss over a three-year period.

Wolves made a £46.1million loss in the 2021/22 financial year and early predictions for the 2022/23 financial year, which will likely be published in February or March, show Wolves are on course to lose somewhere in the region of £60million-£80million.

As a result, they currently need to make a profit this year in order to not breach the rules. Wolves are right on the edge of falling foul of those regulations, and must navigate them carefully.

To do that, the financial team must crunch the numbers to forecast the income and expenditure, hence the recent change in stance on transfer activity – to Lopetegui’s clear disappointment.

Those forecasts take in a huge array of factors including TV revenue, player wages and bonuses, Premier League money for the final league position and player purchases and sales.

It is not as simple as a transfer fee coming in for a player when it comes to Wolves’ profit on the balance sheet. They have to consider the value of the asset (a player in this instance) and how that compares to the fee they received. For example, Ryan Giles and Raul Jimenez have been sold for similar fees, but Giles’ sale will be worth more to Wolves’ bottom line because of his lower wages and because he came through the academy.

Transfers are not as simple as money in and money out. Agent fees, other game-related bonuses and contract lengths all play a factor into each player’s intrinsic value to the club.

It should also not be forgotten that Wolves had to sack Bruno Lage and his backroom staff, which proved costly in October.

It is all about predicting what the club can bring in and what money will be spent, and although frustration at the goalposts being moved will nark at Lopetegui, it is currently Wolves’ reality.

The head coach has been a victim of what came before him, and he’s unfortunately suffering the consequences.

A number of signings have failed to make any impact, such as Goncalo Guedes, who cost £27.5million. Wolves also paid big for Matheus Nunes and Matheus Cunha and are still waiting for a sizeable return.

It is not true that Wolves have offered a loan with an obligation to buy for Bristol City’s Alex Scott, but ironically that would prove to be a shrewd move if they did, as the fee would not count towards this current financial year.

Wolves will be in this difficult position for the whole financial year, including the next January transfer window, but by the next financial year they will be in a much healthier place with the £46.1million loss from 2021/22 no longer counting in the three-year period.

That would give Wolves more wiggle room, but they still have to navigate this year first.

What will be interesting, is to see the hierarchy’s reaction if Wolves start the season badly.

They could give the green light to signings now, but that would put the club at risk of breaching the rules. Fosun have made the decision so far that they will not do that, but their resolve could be tested if Lopetegui continues to protest and Wolves have a poor start to the campaign.

Fans are understandably dubious of the severity of falling foul of these rules, because there is currently no precedent for punishments. Everton and Manchester City have been alleged to have broken the rules, but they have not yet been handed a penalty for it.

If a club had been given £1million fine, Wolves may take a different view of breaking the rules. If a club had been given a six-point fine, people may conclude in hindsight that Wolves made the right call this summer.

For all of the talk about Fosun’s commitment to Wolves, the messages from the club are that they are 100 per cent on board and that the club is a core asset in their portfolio.

Fosun have invested in the last 12 months and the suggestion is that they are still committed to Wolves. It is true, however, as previously reported that they have discussed outside investment with aspirations of improving the facilities at Molineux and taking Wolves to the next level.

Whatever the next step, Wolves must tread carefully.

Comment Guidelines

Iconic Media encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.

Local news you can trust
Follow us
© 2026 Iconic Media Group Ltd. All rights reserved.Cookie SettingsTerms and ConditionsPrivacy notice