Decision to drop prosecution of men held after oil tanker ‘hijacking’ criticised

The decision to halt the case was taken by the Crown Prosecution Service after ‘additional maritime expert evidence’ came to light.

The Nave Andromeda oil tanker
The Nave Andromeda oil tanker

The Home Office has criticised a decision to drop the prosecution of seven men detained by special forces after the suspected hijacking of an oil tanker off the Isle of Wight.

The men, all from Nigeria, were detained by the British Special Boat Service (SBS) after an incident on board the Nave Andromeda on Sunday October 25.

Two men, Matthew John Okorie, 25, and Sunday Sylvester, 22, had already been charged with an offence relating to conduct endangering ships under Section 58 of the Merchant Shipping Act 1995.

Nave Andromeda incident
The Nave Andromeda oil tanker docked next to the Queen Elizabeth II Cruise Terminal in Southampton (Andrew Matthews/PA)

Now, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has decided there is insufficient evidence to continue the case or to charge the other five men detained.

Senior District Crown Prosecutor Sophie Stevens said: “The CPS has a duty to keep all cases under continuous review and, after additional maritime expert evidence came to light, we concluded there was no longer a realistic prospect of conviction and discontinued the case.”

A Home Office spokesman said it was working with the CPS to address the issues in the case.

He said: “We are disappointed by this decision. It is frustrating that there will be no prosecution in relation to this very serious incident and the British people will struggle to understand how this can be the case.

“The Home Office is working with the CPS urgently to resolve the issues raised by this case.

“The immigration cases will be dealt with as quickly as possible and removal action will be pursued against anyone who has no right to remain in the UK.”

The CPS defended its decision by saying the evidence, including mobile phone footage, did not meet the threshold to provide a realistic prospect of conviction.

It said in a statement: “In this case, as the men were due to be released from immigration detention and posed a flight risk the decision to charge was made on the threshold test.

“This test is used when a full file of evidence is not yet available but the seriousness of the case justifies an immediate decision and there is reasonable grounds to believe that continuing the investigation will provide evidence that would give a realistic prospect of conviction.

“Our case was that the actions of the men were responsible for the endangerment of the vessel, but further material was then supplied by a maritime expert which significantly undermined whether there was a threat of danger.

“Initial reports had indicated there was a real and imminent threat, but additional mobile phone footage and further expert analysis of the evidence cast doubt on whether the ship or the crew were put in danger.

“As the evidence could not show that the ship or crew were threatened, the legal test for the offence of conduct endangering ships under S.58 Merchant Shipping Act 1995 was no longer met.

“On that basis we concluded there was no longer a realistic prospect of a conviction for this offence and discontinued the case.”

Bella Sankey, director of Detention Action, said: “It is concerning that the Home Office is publicly criticising a decision by our independent crown prosecution service.

“In this case, on the evidence that has been provided the CPS have concluded that there is insufficient evidence to show the crew and ship were put in danger and there is no realistic prospect of conviction.

“Political interference with the administration of justice undermines the Rule of Law and any attempt to discredit a decision reached by the CPS, or to apply pressure to them, is abusive and unwelcome.”

A Hampshire Police spokesman said the seven men would remain detained subject to immigration procedures.

He said: “We can confirm that seven men, including two men who had previously been charged and who had appeared in court, will now face no further action as part of the Hampshire Constabulary-led investigation into the maritime security incident that took place on board the Nave Andromeda off the coast of the Isle of Wight on Sunday October 25.

“The two men, Matthew John Okorie, 25, and Sunday Sylvester, 22, who were remanded and next due to appear at Southampton Crown Court on January 29 2021, will now face no further action for an offence relating to conduct endangering ships under Section 58 of the Merchant Shipping Act 1995.

“This decision was taken by the Crown Prosecution Service after additional evidence came to light as part of the investigation.

“Five other men, who were arrested on suspicion of seizing or exercising control of a ship by use of threats or force, remained on police bail until January 25 2021.

“They will also now face no further action in relation to the Hampshire Constabulary-led investigation.

“They will remain detained under immigration powers in accordance with published processes.”

Nave Andromeda incident
The Nave Andromeda oil tanker during the incident off the coast of the Isle of Wight (Steve Parsons/PA)

The SBS raid was authorised by Defence Secretary Ben Wallace and Home Secretary Priti Patel following a 10-hour stand-off while the tanker remained off the Isle of Wight.

The 748ft (228m) Nave Andromeda had been heading towards Southampton, having set sail from Lagos in Nigeria.

The ship’s operator, Navios Tanker Management, said the stowaways “illegally boarded” the Liberian-flagged tanker in Lagos.

Sorry, we are not accepting comments on this article.

Top Stories

More from the Express & Star

UK & International News