Express & Star

Alert as culvert works man fined

Residents are being reminded they must seek approval before carrying out any work involving streams, brooks and culverts on their land.

Published
Last updated

It follows a legal case in which a Chaddesley Corbett resident was fined £500 after being prosecuted for covering over an open stream and installing a culvert on his land in Cakebole Lane without permission.

Consent is required for any works that affect the flow of an ordinary watercourse, such as the installation of culverts, weirs or certain bridges, under Section 23 of the Land Drainage Act 1991.

In this recent case, landowner Richard Yardley had covered over a section of Elmley Brook and installed a culvert, increasing the risk of flooding and potentially damaging the ecology and biodiversity of the area.

The prosecution under Section 24 of the Land Drainage Act, was dealt with by a magistrate under the Single Justice Procedure, from legal papers which Wyre Forest District Council lodged with the court on January 22.

The magistrate imposed a fine of £500 and ordered him to pay costs of £194.19 and a victim surcharge of £50.

The case was brought after a senior officer from the North Worcestershire Water Management team visited the site in October 2019 and discovered that Mr Yardley had covered over a six metre section of the stream without consent from the council that would allow him to do so.

In February, the resident was given formal notice to remove the culvert by August 28 last year.

But a site visit in September revealed that the notice had not been complied with.

Amenity

Wyre Forest District Council’s cabinet member with responsibility for water management, Councillor Nicky Martin, said: “It is important for residents to apply for permission before carrying out any work that alters the flow of a watercourse on their land.

“This is a legal requirement irrespective of whether works are permanent or temporary.

“We have seen only too often the devastating impact flooding can have on residents and businesses in our district.

“In this case the land owner was made aware that the work he had carried out was not permitted.

“He was given time to put things right, but ignored the opportunity.

“It is not worth running the risk of being prosecuted and fined for ignoring the law.”

The Environment Agency’s policy document states: “The Agency is opposed to unnecessary culverting of watercourses. Culverting can increase the risk of flooding and the maintenance requirements for a watercourse.

"Also it can destroy wildlife habitats, damage a natural amenity and interrupt the continuity of the linear habitat of a watercourse.”

Sorry, we are not accepting comments on this article.