Chelsea 1 West Brom 0 - match report

A first-half strike from Demba Ba condemned Albion boss Steve Clarke to defeat on his return to Stamford Bridge.

Ba turned home a David Luiz knock-down to punish the Baggies for a flat display in the opening 45 minutes.

Clarke’s men improved after half-time and fought hard late on, but they could not find an equaliser as the hosts triumphed despite more protests and banners from Blues fans directed at interim manager Rafa Benitez.

Chelsea made a bright start and Baggies keeper Ben Foster, being watched from the stands by England manager Roy Hodgson, had to make a brilliant save early on.

Oscar turned a fantastic Ramires cross towards goal from eight yards out but Foster made an instinctive point-blank block.

But on seven minutes Albion tested Petr Cech in the Chelsea goal.

Steven Reid hammered a free-kick from 30 yards and Cech had to push it over the crossbar.

The home side continues to make the running and they had another great chance in the 16th minutes when Oscar got in front of Steven Reid to meet a cross by Cesar Azpilicueta.

The Brazilian had a free header but he placed it straight at Foster.

Foster was called upon again when he dived high to his right to turn a deflected David Luiz free-kick behind for a corner.

But the Baggies keeper was partly at fault for the opening goal, which came from the resulting corner.

The flag-kick was taken short and found its way to Oscar, who delivered a far-post cross that caught Foster in no man’s land.

David Luiz was free to head the ball across goal and Ba was unmarked as he turned it in.

Chelsea were well on top but the Baggies had a rare shot at goal just before half-time.

Shane Long nodded down a diagonal ball but James Morrison sent his effort well over.

Chelsea had the ball in the net early in the second half but Frank Lampard’s ‘goal’ was ruled out for offside against provider Juan Mata.

And the Blues were screaming for a penalty when Eden Hazard tangled with Jonas Olsson and went down in the box.

But referee Kevin Friend waved away the appeal with replays showing minimal contact.

Foster was twice called upon to deny Oscar in the second period, first with a brave block and then with a reaction save low to his right.

But Albion fought hard late on and Cech had to make an excellent stop to prevent an own-goal when Azpilicueta diverted Morrison’s corner towards his own goal.

By Steve Madeley

Comments for: "Chelsea 1 West Brom 0 - match report"

Cyril Randle

Watched on FOX on computer. Could have got a point in the end, but wow, the Brummie commentator for Fox was SO biased in favour of Chelsea it was painful to listen to. He should have his passport removed.

Please tell me I'm wrong, but I could swear Chelsea made FOUR substitutions.

Foster just has to be the best goalkeeper in Europe right now. He was superb.

StripedPyjamaThrostle

It sounded distinctly like Collymore to me, which is impossible. Maybe they've cloned the guy and nobody's caught on yet?! The half-wit comments would certainly lend support to the theory. When I hear Don Goodman's voice on FOX, I'll know then that the Yanks are cloning the Midlands' 'finest' commentators who are in no way biased against the Albion at all...

I have to agree on Foster - superb performance once again. Overall it wasn't a bad performance by our boys; I remember us going to the Bridge just 3 years ago and getting pummelled 6-0. A six-point return from Liverpool (A), Sunderland (H) and Chelsea (A) is not a bad return at all.

Baggie Ed

I think that it was Dean Sturridge but I'm not 100% sure, I am 100% sure that he was a prat though!

Forever Albion

100% Dean Sturridge, switched commentary off!

Island baggie

Have to agree with the negative brummie comentater watched the gane on an arab tv channel iin the pub my mate said it was ex wolves player dean sturridge then had to listen to the same drivle again on sky match choice .Thought the albion support was again fantastic and odw got a good reception and could have scored .

Jack ♣ Hat.

Cyril, guys,

Watched the match on Wizywig mates. good picture but had to buffer up a few times, missed very little of the game, commentary reasonable like our game really. All the best.

BOING~~~~BOING~~~~J♣H.

mboy

good job we didn't upset chelsea too much, being as we want lukaku next season!

Rushall Baggie

No arguments about a 1-0 defeat. No-one could have argued, either, if we had grabbed a late goal to draw. The good news is that in ten years we have gone from lambs to slaughter against the big money clubs (Man U, Chelsea, Arsenal, losing by 5 or 6 goals) to tightly contested affairs, with us winning the occasional game. It will get even better if we keep on building and improving.

baggieboy

Mboy thats a very good point, proberly explains why we didn`t venture over the halfway line again.

Kali

We went to the Bridge looking to blunt their strength rather than attack

their weakness. Chelsea has struggled in the back all season but

we only gave them something to think about in the closing stages.

And when we put them to the sword we repeatedly let them off the hook.

If this Baggie team was set up from the on set to attack that suspect Chelsea defense the outcome

could have been different. We have to put this game behind us quickly and prepare for the next one.

We got 30 points left to contest le

Jack ♣ Hat.

Kali,

Couldn't agree more mate. Now, back to football mode.

BOING~~~~BOING~~~~J♣H.

Robin Brittain

The Mail on Sunday writer commented that Albion were disappointing and are better than that display. Only when PO and JT were brought on did we provide any threat to Chelsea and you wonder why it took so long for Steve Clarke to substitute Graham Dorrans who looked totally out of touch from the start, and Fortune was not much better.

Clarke commented after the game that we were in it until the final whistle but that was only thanks to Ben Foster.

A totally negative team choice from our coach.

astleistheking

We generally start slowly for some reason, but then pick up and start flowing. It's good to see we battled back and showed them we were not going to roll over, so fair play to the boys. It's not so bad losing having tried to play football other than giving up.

Chelsea have a magnificent home record and have probably lost no more than 5-10 in the past 5 years (from what I remember).

Albion til I die!

Jack ♣ Hat.

I was under the misapprehension that with forty points in the bank, we could now come out of our shell and play some adventurous football. Instead I watched an eleven man, park the bus, hoofball system that got wo1-Ves relegated, until the introduction of Osaze and Thomas. How on earth we can win games playing like that is beyond me. Ben Foster was immaculate between the sticks and gave Roy Hodgson plenty to think about. Jonas and G-Mac were immense in the middle, yet all around them players were content to watch Chelsea ping the ball to one another. Jonas was caught in possession a few times because their was no "Out ball" on. What a difference when our two footballers came on and showed a bit of finesse. Can we now get back to our passing at speed game with a few more players in forward positions as that afore mentioned system is boring and dire, also shows the opposition too much respect. Who dares wins comes to mind. Gripe over and done with. Onward and upward with the BAGGIES.

BOING~~~~BOING~~~~J♣H.

Wall Heath Baggie

They will be throwing you off the Committee with comments like 'Park the Bus hoofball system that got the Wolves relegated' . I am somewhat surprised you made it to be honest. We a'int in the strife Wolves and Villa are in , Tranquillooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo !!!!.

Do you really expect us to go there and play expansive open Football ??

we would have got mullered .

Jack ♣ Hat.

Wall Heath,

Don't remember saying we were in the strife that our neighbours find themselves in!. I'll put that down as your added bit of twisted spice. Who was on about open expansive football?, I'm talking balanced football, that would have given our overworked defence some respite and Chelsea would have to have kept extra men back instead of them surging forward a will. After all balanced football is what happened with the introduction of Odemvingay and Thomas. Why do you have to go from one extreme to the other or are you just trying to agitate?. All the best.

BOING~~~~BOING~~~~J♣H.

Brierleyhillbaggie

Hi jack

Agree with what you say mate we should off gone there and had a go not gungho by any means but a little more attacking. Didn't get to watch the game live but listened on radio and to be honest they said we were poor. We obviously play better with a little width in the team but sc doesn't pick any. They should start po now cause it will only drag on and I think the whole sarga should now be over.

As for whb jack don't upset him he will tell you to stay away from his club as he don't like other people's thoughts haha

Wall Heath Baggie

JACK

I was merely trying to spark a little debate , sorry if it agitated you and rest assured i will not bother you again , keep safe.

Hugh Lurker

No complaints here, the Baggies were defiant in preventing Chelsea from adding to their one goal, unfortunately going forward Albion were broken down somewhat comprehensively by a determined Chelsea display. Maybe a little more luck from set pieces and it could have been a draw. Having said that the Albion blocked two or three goalward bound efforts.

I would like to know S Clarkes views regarding his 'team's' holding on to the ball, regardless of who the opposition is. I find it of interest because in games that we win we lose out on overall possesion, not in all games, but it is clearly evident.

stripes ay we

Simon

Agree totally about the commentary. Every slight Albion mistake was heavily criticized; Chelsea made out to be world beaters which they're not. The game was decided by a defensive lapse. Don't agree it was Fosters fault it should have been put out for a corner. Apart from the goal, Chelsea didn't create much else in the way of clear cut chances. The ref didn't give us much. Odem's booking was a joke. All that said the result was probably about right.

SC Baggie

Good effort and well played Foster AGAIN. Disappointed that you know who came on again and did his usual nothing....no contribution again as in the other twelve times. What a pity it was not young Brown who had the chance. At least we would have had one record to shout about.

baggieboy

just got back from the bridge, woeful inept peformanc, Yacob, morrison, fortune, olsson , dorrans,long awful just awful,unbelievable shoolboy defending for goal, closest we came to scoring ben foster yes ben foster in last minute and even he was all over the place for goal, although he was man of the match, if we miss brunt and lukaku that much jp best get is chequebook out, as much as i despise po for what he done i must say when he came on he looked like he could make somthing happen,it hurts i know, but its the truth.

We Only Need One Half!

baggieboyleftpegbrusnt23psalm, you are seriously deranged, its time for yet another name change you fool, you may have just got back from the Bridge, but the match was at Stamford Bridge not Great Bridge!

We may have struggled to cross the half way line in the first half, but don't worry, we still be in the right half of The Prem League Table come the end of the season.

it hurts i know, but its the truth.

We Only Need One Half!

Bit disappointed today, thought we could have done more to get at them in the first 45, but we hardly seemed to get out of own half, we lacked a cutting edge, and it was abundantly clear that edge was Lukaku.

Long was running his legs off but there was no finished product, and, but for Foster being on form it could have been 3-4 nil by half time. Mulumbu and Yacob never seemed to click to their usual high standards either. Still everyone has off days.

Second half improved some what, but we still couldn't punish them, in all honesty, upon until the last frantic 10-15 minutes I don't think we looked likely to score at all.

Still, a few years back we would have been saying well at least we never got tanked, now, we go to places like the Bridge and are disappointed we never got anything out of the game. I suppose that's progress, of a sort!

Cyril, I watched same coverage, you are correct about the common tater, but I would have thought an old war horse like you would be used to it, its gone on as long as I can remember, admittedly more so since the inception of the Prem, I just assumed it had always been like it?

Cyril Randle

Wonoh, I am used to it mate but I still criticise them for it in the fond hope someone might tip them off what one-eyed idiots sound like.

1st half was a non-event for us. We couldn't get a pass to a man out of defence which made Chelsea look better than they were in fact. One comment made by a Yank rang true though. Why is there not someone out there who can get Baggies organised BEFORE the manager has to at half-time. I think I'd have brought on P.O. much sooner. He got in a few good dribbles and a shot or two. The defence side of our game is now very professional but somewhat boring to watch. I suppose the first job is to make us hard to beat, but I do like a bit of cavalier play myself.

We Only Need One Half!

Cyril, I know where the yanks coming from, but this is not a new phenomenon. Inevitably there will be games where we are not the first to score, and the best time to reorganise is half time.

Under RDM we were the same, lost count of how many times we fell behind in first half, only to come out in second and get a win (hence my nom de plume) but in those games the attitude seemed to be more caution to the wind cus we gonna score one more than you.

Now we seem a lot more cagey when we go behind, has I previously said, up until the last 10-15 minutes I never felt we were going to score, I suppose its horses for courses, RDM would spend a whole 45 minutes going for it, with a might as well lose 10 nil as 1 nil attitude, where as SC obviously likes to spend three quarters of the 2nd half trying to secure at least a point first, before finally dropping the hammer in the last quarter

Lets not forget, RDM got us promoted with that game plan in mind, but it didn't transfer too well to the Premiership. SC used his way as recently as Liverpool, and it worked. I still felt in the first half Saturday that if we could get to half time with it at 1-0 we could get something out of the game come the final whistle. That's my interpretation of the difference anyway. Both systems have their merits and faults.

Mind you, RDMs first game in charge of us back in the Prem was also at Stamford Bridge, and we lost that one 6-0! you pays your money, and youse takes your chances!

Ergo, Saturday could be seen as progress, in a perverse kinda of way!

baggieboy

Thing is wonoh you dont pay the money do you, as your armchair fan, me, Do lally and M boy do.

Hurts i know, but its the truth.

Jack ♣ Hat.

One Half,

I thought too much emphasis was put on defending allowing Chelsea the freedom of the park including wide areas. Hope this doesn't happen against Swansea or they will be loving us, to put it mildly. Morrison looked as though he was shackled with defensive duties. Back to rapid passing and movement all over the park mate, that is our game. Look how we sharpened up after the introduction of Osaze and Jerome. Long had to chase too much hopeless long ball, no wonder he didn't look good, just not fair on the guy. My opinion mind. Onward and upward with the BAGGIES.

BOING~~~~BOING~~~~J♣H.

We Only Need One Half!

Jack see above!

On the subject of Swansea, in the reverse leg they had three before the half time whistle, so fingers crossed we WILL play from the start in this game at least.

Swansea, are this seasons Blackpool to a degree (every season has them) and if we are not careful we are in danger of getting another Stoke type monkey on our back (who are up after Swansea, boo hiss) having not beat them in our three previous Prem games against them.

Lets be honest, that night back in November they out played us, their passing was superb, and Mulumbu and Yacob had a bad night of it.

I would like to see us a lot tighter in the midfield this time, and Michu has been a threat all season that needs to be neutralised, even though it was Routledge who got two of the goals that night.

I would also like us to start this one 4 4 2, rather than just Lukaku on his own up front has he was at there's.

On the plus side we do have Foster this time, not wanting to denigrate Myhill, who I thought deputised admirably when asked, despite my own reservations to the contrary, he is not as good as Foster, simple.

It may, or may not surprise some of you, has I was not aware of it, I have always thought of Dec/Jan as our dark months, turns out its March according to this statistic I came across, of teams to have played 20+ PL games in March, only Ipswich Town (0.61) average fewer points per game than West Brom (0.85)

Beware the games of March! Bill Shakespeare, sort of, ish?

p.s. pre seasons misconceptions loom large, looking at tickets for Swansea today, a top half team, Cat B £25 (as was Everton) yet to see a team flirting with relegation, i.e. Newcastle, going to cost me £39 because they were seen has a Cat A team pre season. Its a funny old game.

p.p.s. has there been any free away coaches this year???

Shropshirebaggy

This was always going to be a big ask but I thought we gave a good account of ourselves, we were well organised and but for a bit of bad luck at the end, we could have nicked a point. To put it in perspective, our history against Chelsea is the worst of all the big clubs, we've never got a point at Stamford Bridge and have only scored one goal in all our Premier League matches there so history was against us too.

Disapointed yes, but when you look at the chances that Chelsea created it could have been worse.

We move on.

We Only Need One Half!

Just read the funniest thing since Pete's impression of Paul Revere,

"Harry Redknapp was incandescent with rage on Saturday evening, accusing an agent of leaking false information in a bid to destabilise the club."

Arry, look up the word irony!

Justice? not quite, but its a start!

kevr pride of the midlands

cyril, no chelsea did not make four subs, mikel,moses,torres came on for mata,hazard and ba.

and kevin friend was the ref, 41 548 attendance. maybe it was the banks's bitter that got your mind fuddled.

meanwhile the dingles are going down and long may it continue.

Cyril Randle

kevr.potm. Hand on heart kev I've no idea what Banks's bitter tastes like. I probably got confused with the emphasis on Chelsea all the time.

I did make a nice cup of tea at half time though. If we'd managed a draw I might have indulged in a small vodka and orange before bed. Puts me out like a lighted Randle's candle.

PS: for shandy lovers, I can recommend Beck's beer and Shweppes lemonade though.

baggieinmanc

I never expected us to get anything there and I even said to myself that a 1-0 or 2-1 would be a good confidence result for us. i think we can build on this performance and i was happy with Clarkes comments after the game. It sounds like they're gonna try thier best to get into Europe where as last week I was afraid that they had given up on the idea. We obviously miss Lukaku when he doesn't play so instead of worrying about whether or not we are going to get him next season DA and RG will hopefully be scouring the world of football for a suitable replacement.

Very proud of what we're doing this season. Well done Albion and I hope PO can get a few goals before the end of the season to increase interest in him and booster our league position.

Boing Boing

Jack ♣ Hat.

We showed Chelsea too much respect, we have banked forty points, so why place all our mid fielders on defensive duties. Should have started with Osaze and Jerome from the outset as the attack was virtually nil without our their nifty footwork. Even Jonas was caught out on occasions as he held on to the ball too long as the "Out-ball" was not on the mid-fielders were stuck behind him. Good job Ben Foster filled Roy's eyes with another breath taking performance. Lets play more adventurous now we have the forty points and are safe. Y'know a bit of "Who dares wins" stuff. Onward and upward with the BAGGIES.

BOING~~~~BOING~~~~J♣H.

P.S. ....if only we had started with the two subs who changed the game.

Jack ♣ Hat.

Sorry guys, thought my first post was lost.

BOING~~~~BOING~~~~J♣H.

Bromham Baggie

In the real world I would never wish to deprive a man of his job, but in the world of football I would have liked to have done for Benitez; but only because it would have meant three points for us. In the big scheme of things this result isn't too bad. Let's face it, MU, MC or even Liverpool could go to Stamford Bridge and lose.

Phil Osopher

No real surprise,

Ben Foster kept the score acceptable. We move on to the next game. We have had a good season overall guys. We as fans, got carried away with our early season success, and rightly so. Its nice to dream now and again, but a club of our stature should be looking for consolidation in the Premier league, and anything beyond that will be a big bonus. I don't think we will lose many of our players at the end of the season, apart from the obvious ones, who want to leave. Hope we get Lukaku for another season.

Up the Baggies.

curlybaggie

don't you find it a worry that we struggle without lukaku? he isn't even our player, what will we do for goals next season?

astleistheking

I don't worry, who scored against Chelsea the last 2 times we played them? not Lukaku was it.

tony browns moustache

we just sat back and invited pressure, come we should have bombed forward, lose the momentum , lose the battle, come on u baggies

baggie in blues territory

cyril randall and baggie. thanks for your suggestions. I

found a couple of places to view the game.

not the best we have ever played but equally not the

worst either

COYB

Cyril Randle

baggieinbt. Glad you came into West Brom territory to watch. It's a good atmosphere in our pubs too. I did send details of where I normally go but it didn't make it on here. Understandable from E&S angle but the pubs need all the support they can get right now. The E.U. backed football on TV for all so even they don't get everything wrong ! Never thought I'd say that.

tony browns moustache

Phil Osopher- it is right to dream now and again, spot on but the word consolidate , im not to sure but to build would be better, we aint to far away from the top six, but this season to do the europa league would be to much for our squad me thinks, in the summer we got to strengthen 3 mill on a striker and 3 mill on a midfielder, not silly money , weve proved that, so come on the the albion

solihullbaggie

must have been watching some other game then, okay Ben Foster was motm but why cant our players do simple things like trapping or controling the ball, Passing the ball to our own players,Olsson was getting caught with the ball 3 or 4 times, and that my friends is the reason that we lost, We made chelsea look good, Having said that i'm proud that i'm a Baggie we are in a good place at the mo, I just think we should have done more to get a result,not just the last 10 mins.

Jack ♣ Hat.

solihull,

The only reason Jonas was caught in possession was no forward to accept the out ball they were stuck behind him ball watching instead of doing what they are good at, so he had to hold on to it longer than he would normally have to. That changed with the arrival of the substitutes. We were much better balanced and looked like getting a goal or two, mate.

BOING~~~~BOING~~~~J♣H.

Do Lallytap

Right Oh, here goes....

Foster...Part to blame for the goal but he was fantastic the rest of the match

Reid....solid, good game

Olsson... so - so again.

McAuley, part to blame for the goal, he should have seen Ba coming, rest of match he was solid

Yacob...Probably one of his worse games for the Albion, kept giving the ball away in dangerous positions.

Ridgwell...Poor, very poor, keeps drifting upfield leaving the back door open as usual and struggling to get back.

Morrison...So-so, battled but little impact.

Mulumbu...Usual workhorse battle, got stuck in and it was between him and Foster for Man of the match

Dorrans...Not one of his better days, gave ball away in panic too often

Long...ineffective, no impact what-so-ever and has got into the habit of going to ground a bit too quick for my liking.

Fortune... worked hard, held the ball up well but to me even though Long was there Fortune seemed to be on his own.

Odemwingie....Changed the game completely and must be a contender to start in the next game.

Thomas, again gave a different dimension for the game, seems hungry and eager.

Rosenberg....Did he really come on ??...nowhere to be seen.

OK, lets put it into perspective here, we played the team 3rd in the league and the last 20 mins we had them on the rack even if MOTD didn't show it and really we could have sneaked it for a deserved draw but it wasn't to be.

The critical point for me, and it may upset a few, we need Odemwingie, he turned the game on it's head and we went from a midfield/defending team into an attacking team and we had Chelsea rattled and surely Clarke MUST see that this is the way to start a match...ATTACK... not sitting back absorbing it all, giving teams too much respect.

If we had started off the way we finished the Chelsea match we would be talking a different game, it would have been 3 points.

Change of subject slightly... Why is it that grown men go to the away matches, get to their seat 3 mins before the start, absolutely ratted out of their brain and after spending the best part of £50 for the seat to then not look at the match but spent the whole 90 mins swearing and cussin at the stewards, programme seller, pie man and home fans all match...swearing the worse language imaginable with kids, young kids all around them...then have the audacity to boo ODEM calling HIM an embarrassment.

Stay at home and watch it on Fox Sports or go down to Dingle Town where you would fit in quite easily and let REAL supporters enjoy the match away from neanderthals like you !

Did I boo Odem...NO...we needed him....did I boo the team...NO because that last 20 mins showed us what we are capeable of.

So, Chelsea out of the way and the next tester will be the Swansea game, not easy and we need to ATTACK from the start and not sit back....go get em and one of these matches we would get a bagful of goals if Clarky plays it right....GO FOR IT !!

Wall Heath Baggie

A couple of weeks ago you wanted Odemwingie to never play for the Club again , now you say we need him . Yow cor have ya cake and eat it.

Kev in Mallorca

If 'e cor av cerk can 'e av sum of yowa pie?

Adeu

We Only Need One Half!

Kev, Max (or is it Desperate Dan?) could have fed Woodman corner with the size of that pie! ;-)

We Only Need One Half!

Hey Kev, Do Lally wants to know why blokes go to games than miss most of it?

Do you want to field that one lolol

Robin Brittain

You can while we continue to pay him. To leave him on the bench for so long was bad judgement by Clarke.

baggieboy

Do lallytap i would like to know how they got ratted because we was paying £4-10p a pint down there, nice pub though, your spot on about the game and about Long.

Do Lallytap

Did you see them Baggieboy ?

We were in the Lower Tier and they were an embarrassment to the club.

2 of them got ejected but the rest of them should have followed them.

CantelloRocket 78

'wolf' boy-

I seem to recall WONOH suggested you visit The Vine before one of the games, but you made a pathetic excuse about not goin' in pubs before home games, then you moan about beer prices in London pubs on match day-

so it'll cost you a fortune to drown yer sorrows when wolves lose at Millwall Tuesday night,

Ha ha ha ha ha.........

Jack ♣ Hat.

Phil Osopher,

I am still carried away as we are having a "Bostin" season mate, our club is embedded in the top nine at this time and we are safely in the "Hat" for the forthcoming one, season that is. Cheers and beers from now on in, for us anyway. You seem to be talking as though the bottom has dropped out of our season mate. Come on join the good times pardner. "Yeeee Haaaa, head 'em up move 'em out". The BAGGIES will keep 'em rollin'. The good times, that is.

BOING~~~~BOING~~~~J♣H.

Wall Heath Baggie

Watched the Wolves game Friday and we could do worse than go for Bacary Sako in the summer Good attitude , good left foot and plenty of pace.

CantelloRocket 78

Mornin' Max,

whenever I've watched Wolves on the telly this season, Sako looks to be the only player they've got goin' forward with any quality, although his defending might be rubbish ( pushin' players over in the penalty area for example ), and it seems many comments from wolves fans suggest he can be lazy a lot of the time.

Still, in the right environment maybe he'd improve, cor see that in Division One, can you......? :)

Robin Brittain

Yes - Exchange for Dorrans

Wall Heath Baggie

I would not wish League 1 on Dorrans .

Brummie roader Ryan

Poor performance we gave Chelsea far too much respect we should have got "at them" more. We are on 40 points might as well have had a go.

Surprised Odemwingie didn't start why keep him if we are not going to play him? No use bringing him on for the last 10 mins Might as well have banked the money.

I think Clark was trying to do a Liverpool, defend all game and have a go the last 10 mins. Felt sorry for Shane Long he was the only player in their half for most the game had no service at all.

Yacob has been looking sloppy the last few weeks giving cheep free kicks away also Morrison has been quiet BUT he has been playing out of position. Dorrans was poor lost a yard of pace and cutting edge and gives the ball away too often not the player he used to be can he ever get back to the top of his game?

Overall a good defensive performance but a poor attacking performance.

Swansea at home next big game we are both on 40 points

boing boing

BURNLEY BAGGIE

Should have gone for the jugular from the start and unsettled the crowd as we had nothing to lose and everything to gain.

Looks like the ding1e5 are going down i said this time last year to be carefull what they wished for with MM. it's sad really as I miss our little derby games also think Villa will go as well now so no derby games for a while.

Still we really do know who we are now.

Inside Man

This was exactly how we set up against Liverpool. Defence, soecifically Foster keep it close until last 20ish minutes then throw on a few attackers and see if we can nick sonething. I am happy with that as to try and play Chelsea at their own game would generally lead to a big loss. 13 points from 11 games against the top 7 in the league is a very good return.

Robin Brittain

That theory is based upon the goalkeeper always having a good game.

We could and should have tested their defence a lot more. If you defend as deep as we did on Saturday and leave a huge gap between the lone striker and the rest of the team you will create very little and to gamble on saving the game at the death is not a calculated risk. Most of the points we have accumulated against the top seven have been gained by being positive , not the negativity we witnessed on Saturday.

b71bomber

Robin Brittain

I do so agree with your comments

Steve employed a containing game and we lost 1 - 0.

I've seen the old Leeds and Arsenal teams tacticly mix their 90 mins of play. They would sit back and contain and without warning change their tactics and push forward, opposing teams were bemused by these tactics.

What tactics will Steve employ against Swansea at home, i predict Swansea pushing forward more so than Albion and enjoying more possesion, and Swansea are your average team according to the table.

These are my thoughts based on observations they are not meant to be negative

CantelloRocket 78

Inside Man-

precisely.

I honestly feel some people need a reality check.

Liverpool have been showing much better form lately, before we played 'em, they'd just had 3-0, 4-0 and 5-0 wins at home-

Chelsea are probably classed as one of the top 3 clubs in English football, and won the Champion's League a few months ago-

this is our THIRD season back from the Championship, if we'd gone all out attack and been hammered, people on here would have said-

'that's embarrassing, Steve got it completely wrong, tactically naive!!'.

It's maybe worth remembering some of the players making up our first XI 2-3 years ago-

Carson, Jara, Meite, Ibanez, Cech, Miller, Bednar, etc.

And people wanna moan about the current players............?

solihullbaggie

I dont think us fans who spend quite a bit of money on going to away games are happy to see us make an effort in the last ten mins

Shropshirebaggy

Would you have preferred to play open expansive football and get thumped 6-0? Many better sides than Albion have gone to Stamford Bridge and come away with their tails between their legs.

We lost because Chelsea were better than us on the day, simple.

Phil Osopher

Jack ♣ Hat.

I know what you're saying buddy, I just want them to keep winning. The pressure is off now, so lets just have a go in the remaining games, and see where we end up.

tony browns moustache.

I agree we will need to strengthen, but with JP at the helm, we will have to unearth a few jewels. We won't be splashing the cash. I'm not having a go at JP, because we will always be financially stable whilst he's at the helm.

Ah well, back to the cheers & beers lads.

AndyH

Evening all,

after a time reading and thinking about the game....well...did we give them a little too much respect..maybe but it just seemed liked one of thoswe games to me. We had chances to get something out of it but never reached the high notes of the last few weeks - but that said we are still having a great season and can still push on and finish strongly. It's just a dropped stitch in a season lomg thread of football - and who can say what will happen next?? Swansea may turn up and play like gods or turnips...anything is possible really. We were not that bad against chelsea....it was just one fo those games in my mind. That said ben Foster was total class!!!

Looking forward to the Laurie Cunningham doc on wednesday - will be playing my form in school tomorrow the footage from the man utd 5-3 game!!

regards

AndyH

Kev in Mallorca

One 'arf

It was Max's fault but at least I slept like a baby.

Adeu

Kev in Mallorca

One 'arf

at the match!

Adeu

par·a·pher·na·lia

some clever posts on here referring to SC substitutions, opinunated hindsight.

if a team can get to the last fifteen minutes without using any subs, especialy against a Chelsea like team.

why not put three runners on, specifically attacking midfield and strikers