246 Wolverhampton Council staff are facing axe by spring
Thursday 30th December 2010, 11:30AM GMT.
At least 246 staff will lose their jobs at Wolverhampton City Council by the end of March when the council will lose £20.4 million in grants, it can be revealed today.
Bosses at the council said that was the number of workers on fixed-term contracts whose jobs are funded by external grants from the government that are due to be cut by the spring.
But bosses have warned that they are still working to identify staff whose jobs are funded by grants that may still be cut later on in the financial year.
Details of which departments are affected have not been revealed but the posts will see 91 manual and clerical jobs go along with 154, professional, managerial and technical staff.
One under 18 will also be made redundant.
The council has £4.8 million available to pay for redundancy compensation.
Staff are being invited to apply for voluntary redundancy but if the council does not axe 246 posts by March 31 — when the funding runs out — it will have to make compulsory redundancies.
The cuts relate to 3.5 per cent of the council’s workforce outside of schools, which are not being affected.
Wolverhampton City Council is losing £20.4 million in grants, or seven per cent of its funding, on March 31 taking its annual budget in 2011 to £292m.
A further £9.6m will be cut the year after.
Leader of the council Roger Lawrence said: “It is going to be a very difficult.”
Business Awards
Book a Business Awards table
Join our celebrations of the region's best in business on Thursday March 22 - book your table now
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Express & Star and Shropshire Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases
OUR NEW APP
Get the new E&S app
Download the Express & Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.

I quote from the article.
“they are still working to identify staff whose jobs are funded by grants”.
So they do not know which member of staff is on the Council payroll or funded by a grant?
Marvelous!
Roger Lawrence should start the cuts with his own job and advertise for people who actually know what they are doing. You lot would not last five minutes in the ‘real world’.
Report abuse
DC is right, if people cannot do the job they should not be feather bedded with redundancy pay etc. If i had failled during my working life, i would have lost the lot so why does the city council employees look at the real world before spending yet more of your money on compensating the inneficient, those who cannot do the job and those who are only there by virtue of luck.
Report abuse
Unlike the other two comments I do not take joy in reading about people being made redundant. They need to see the bigger picture
Unemployment is very bad for the country especially Wolverhampton, – the midlands will suffer dis proportionally.
when there are large scale redundancies – public and private – you will see – Demand outstrips supply – not only will unemployment go up – but with such a large pool of skilled unemployed people available
( like it or not local govt employees are ) – wages will plummet.
there will be less money being spent int the economy of Wolverhampton – it will have a knock on affect on the private sector and large scale unemployment is bad for social stability
So while the above comments seem to wallow in spiteful and petty enjoyment at the thought of people being made redundant – I despair for the town
Report abuse
Anon
While I agree with your comments, my outlook is on how the council has been run in the past / present. I work in the private sector and have close dealings with local authorities (not just Wton) for projects I work on. I have found endless and needless red tape. Departments not commuicating with each other, nobody willing to make a decision ‘not my job’. Processes take months at massive cost to the Tax payer. If this happenned in the real world nothing would ever get done and nobody would get paid. It is time to sort the wheat from the chaf and get Wolverhampton running efficiently. There maybe sacrifices but it should be for the better. Start by getting rid of the old school and get in some fresh blood.
Report abuse
Would Councillor Roger Lawrence like to comment on why the bosses keep their high paid jobs and the front line staff who actually do the work get cut.
Look at Wolverhampton homes for example 6 directors paid over 80 grand each and many managers paid over 40 grand.
Do they need that many to run the service.
Unfortunately the cuts are always made at the bottom whilst the fat cats look after themselves.
Wolverhampton Council gravy train keeps on rolling.
What are the councillors doing they have had the wool pulled over their eyes for years.
At least Cooperman in Sandwell is trying to get rid of the fat cats
Report abuse