Midlands councils pay £10.6m for minor accidents

Saturday 25th September 2010, 11:29AM BST.

Midlands councils pay £10.6m for minor accidents

Millions of pounds in compensation for minor accidents like trips and falls is being paid out by councils in the West Midlands and Staffordshire every year – with more than half the cash pocketed by solicitors.

Figures obtained by the Express & Star show £10.6 million has been paid out in “public liability” claims by the region’s councils in the last two years. Almost £6.1m of taxpayers’ money went straight to the claimants’ solicitors.

Successful claims range from the £35,000 paid by Staffordshire County Council for a broken hand caused by faulty paving to £40,000 paid by Wolverhampton City Council to a motorcyclist whose bike was “damaged by a build up of gravel, rubble and bits of metal” on a road.

In another case the city council, which has paid out £1.8m in five years, was ordered to pay £900 to a resident who fell on a broken slab, while the solicitors were awarded £21,000 costs.

The bulk of the payouts is thought to result from solicitors who offer to represent claimants injured on council property on a ‘no win, no fee’ basis.

Wolverhampton South West Conservative MP Paul Uppal said today: “We are living with a compensation culture. Nobody wants to take responsibility – the default position is to sue. Daytime television is filled with adverts encouraging people to claim and it’s a racket.”

Councillor Ben Adams, Staffordshire County Council’s cabinet member for communities, said: “We would advise anyone entering into a no win, no fee agreement to make sure they know exactly what they’re signing up to.

“The council has no discretion to decide how much money should be retained by the claimant’s solicitor.”

The revelation comes as the Conservative party prepares to debate the no win, no fee culture at its October conference in Birmingham.

It is expected to propose reforms that could make it tougher for personal injury solicitors to claim excessive costs.


  1. 1
    Si1

    10.5 mill for dodgy pavements and most of it not even to the people who fell over. How many public sector jobs is this? A few thousand, even on council wages. Come on then Tories put your money where your mouth is.

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Woody

    Let us hope David Cameron keeps his pledge and gets rid of these “ambulance chasers”. I for one am sick of this culture and the Solicitors making money from peoples misfortune.

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    English Exile

    Bloody Health and Safety again.
    Britain is the ONLY country in Europe with an H&S Executive and the only country in Europe to make an industry out of H&S.
    Over here in Malaga a women recently tried to sue the city council for a trip on the pavement.
    It was thrown out by the judge because no one else had had a problem and ”she should have been looking where she was going”.
    Brilliant.
    Just remember this: Next time you look in a mirror you are looking at your own safety officer.

    Report abuse

    • Jimbo

      How is it Health and Safety when it’s clearly solicitors lining their pockets. Did you read the story?

      Report abuse

      • English Exile

        Yes I DID read the story, are you suggesting ”faulty paving” is not Health and Safety?
        The ”uneven border” is not Health and Safety.
        Sorry but Health and Safety is the blood line these leaches, called solicitors, live off.
        Why didn’t these ”injured”people look where they were going?
        ”Uneven border” have you ever heard anything like it? Only in the UK.

        Report abuse

        • Jimbo

          These cases are awarded under the tort of negligence i.e the duty of care required to another person. The award of £39 as mentioned in the story as a result of faulty paving would reflect the injury sustained and the contribution towards the injury of the claimant i.e not looking where they were going. The solicitor would have known the quantum of any award but atill pursued the case because there fees are paid regardless! To cite H&S doesn’t mean anything it’s complete nonsense! If everybody followed H&S then when a claim was made in court under “negligence” it would be very easy to throw out as all reasonable precautions would have been made. It’s not H&S that awards money but the breach in your duty of care which is legal doctrine.

          Report abuse

  4. 4
    Giddy

    The solicitors are merely cutting edge private sector wealth creators, aren’t they?

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    Stan Still

    Why am I paying for other people’s stupidity and carelessness?

    Report abuse

  6. 6
    Karen

    Seems like the Councils need to employ decent insurance companies to cover these claims, and investigate them. Having worked dealing with Joe Public and insurance claims, a lot are ‘chancers’ out for a quick payoff.

    Report abuse



Video News From ITN

Business Awards

Book a Business Awards table Book a Business Awards table

Join our celebrations of the region's best in business on Thursday March 22 - book your table now

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Express & Star and Shropshire Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

entertainment

All the film reviews All the film reviews

Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases

OUR NEW APP

Get the new E&S app Get the new E&S app

Download the Express & Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.