Judge hits out after assault case is dropped
Tuesday 21st September 2010, 11:30AM BST.
A judge has hit out at victims of violent crime who treat the police like their own “private security service” after a case against a Wolverhampton teenager was dropped because the main witness pulled out.
Judge Rosalind Bush said police and court time was being wasted by victims who refused to give evidence after initially co-operating. She made her comments after the case against Michael Palmer, who was charged with assault and theft following an incident on June 7.
Mr Warren Stanier, prosecuting, told Judge Bush yesterday that the alleged victim had been “elusive” and while he stood by his statement to police, he wanted to “put the matter behind him” and not have any more to do with the case.
Police were satisfied he had not been pressured into not co-operating, said Mr Stanier.
Judge Bush said: “This is happening more and more and more. People are getting into fights or are injured, call the police to stop it happening at that moment like a private security service.
“When the police stop it happening, these complainants are not prepared to support any prosecution.
“They treat the police like an emergency resource to stop themselves being hit at the time and then after that, that’s it.”
Addressing the prosecutor, she added: “It wastes the police time, it wastes our time and it wastes your time.”
She entered not guilty verdicts in the case of Palmer, aged 19, of Lennox Gardens, Penn Fields, who is currently serving a prison sentence for another matter.
It is the second time a Wolverhampton judge has been critical following the outcome of cases in recent weeks.
Earlier this month, Judge Amjad Nawaz hit out at prosecutors, claiming a case involving a man who was allegedly held against his will in Walsall and interrogated was “watered down and made meaningless” when serious charges were dropped.
Three men were given the chance to admit the lesser charge of affray and were given community orders.
Business Awards
Book a Business Awards table
Join our celebrations of the region's best in business on Thursday March 22 - book your table now
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Express & Star and Shropshire Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases
OUR NEW APP
Get the new E&S app
Download the Express & Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.

““They treat the police like an emergency resource to stop themselves being hit at the time and then after that, that’s it.”
What?! People treat the police like an emergency service?! Wow, how silly of them, to pay for the police out of their taxes and then expect a measure of protection.
If people don’t want to drag out a distressing experience, seeing it through the courts in a process that can take months, having to confront their attackers again, and have them know who they are and where they live, only to see the attacker get given a few hours community service, then that’s their perogative… what does this judge expect people to do when they are the victim of a crime? Does she really think that if a person isn’t willing to prosecute, they’ve got no right to expect protection?!
If people had real confidence that the legal system worked in favour of law-abiding citizens, then they might be more inclined to pursue these cases through the courts.
Report abuse
Absolutely idiotic statement – what exactly are they to do when they’re being assaulted?
Report abuse
standing on roadsides with speed cameras catching the real criminals motorists going a few mph oveer the speed limit. this generates income, now more important than justice
Report abuse
probably thought it would be a waste of time with some of the sentences dished out by the judges
Report abuse
phil, perhaps you’ve seen the E&S article: ‘Oldbury driver in 70mph car chase gets 14th ban’. The guy didn’t receive a jail sentence, because he said it wouldn’t stop his antics. I think this is a perfect demonstration of what you’re referring to. Does the judge have the foresight to consider the reasons why people don’t proceed, rather than just castigate the alleged victims for the crime (joke) of treating the British police force as the first port of calling an emergency? I’ll let you draw your own conclusions..
Report abuse
“People are getting into fights or are injured, call the police to stop it happening at that moment like a private security service.”
The police are the first port of call; they are supposed to be a security service for the masses, are they not? To further disambiguate the reference, let’s look at the possible reasons why some people don’t bother proceeding: police stations that aren’t there to serve their local communities; GOVERNMENT mismanagement and lack of funding; political policing (and media coverage). Not to mention the law being considered an ass when it comes to dealing REAL justice. You want reasons for this apathy? Walk around the streets when we have no police stations open and no visible police presence for miles.
Report abuse
All hail judge Bush for saying it as it is, we need more like this who are willing to speak their minds.
Report abuse