Perhaps this newspaper should show that it is capable of real journalism, and it is fair, and is not willingly discriminating against the sick and disabled with biased reporting.

Try going back to Mr Grayling and ask him, just exactly how the assessment clarifies what sort of work you are capable of?

Perhaps he could explain why they are urgently reviewing the ESA system?

Perhaps he could explain why the CAB have condemned it as unfit for purpose.

Perhaps he could explain why the ‘software’ used to assess people is not allowed to be proven as unfit for purpose by the public who fund it’s development?

Perhaps he could explain why they need to retest people when those people already have been tested, and ARE retested on a regular basis to show that the ARE NOT capable of working.

Perhaps he could explain why when their own figures show fraud on IB is 0.5 percent or less, there was a target set in advance (of any testing) to fail 1 million people (which is massively more than 0.5 percent).

Perhaps he could explain why some people are DYING before there appeal is heard?

Perhaps he could explain why criminal charges are not brought to bear on those responsible for the clear corruption in the system?

Many people have proven that ATOS LIE on medical reports, and the DWP are making reasonable decisions (even the tribunal service published a report slamming the qaulity of ATOS reports and DWP decision making.)

Perhaps, when the paper has grilled the sources they used for this article, and published all the responses, then they can hold their head high, and not be thought of as part of the campaign of hatred against the sick and disabled.
By asking for further clarification and either updating this article or publishing a new one, at least your paper will not be seen to harrassing and victimising the sick and disabled.

Report abuse