Time to map out a plan for Villa's future
- Says blogger Matthew Turvey
Utilities may pay to carry out roadworks
Tuesday 23rd February 2010, 11:30AM GMT.
Utility firms may have to pre-book and pay to carry out roadworks across the West Midlands – and could be fined if they overrun.
The West Midlands-wide plans would ensure better regulation of projects to dig up roads in a bid to reduce disruption. Gas, water and power companies would be charged to shut roads across the region and pre-book their time on the highways to avoid clashes. If the Permit Operator Scheme was adopted, it could raise up to £2.5 million a year in revenue for councils.
At present utility companies simply have to give councils notice of where they will be carrying out work and how long it will last.
But under the new scheme companies would only be allowed on the roads after buying a permit.
The proposals fall under the Traffic Management Act (TMA) 2004, which was brought into effect in April 2008.
Councils are only now being actively encouraged to become permit operators by the Government.
Giving the local authorities more control over roadworks, bosses will have to approve applications, can set conditions on the work and have the power to issue fines if work overruns.
The project was discussed last night at a meeting of Walsall’s full council.
Cabinet member for highways councillor Tom Ansell said: “We are working with neighbouring authorities to develop a scheme for the West Midlands as a whole. Officers are investigating the benefits.”
He added: “While I agree there is a potential for income it is unquantifiable at the moment.
“Once we join we will actively pursue any further income into the authority.”
Each local authority can decide whether or not to become a PSO.
They can also decide the scope of their permit schemes, and the level of permit fees.
Business Awards
Read the full story here
Full coverage of awards celebrating the region's best businesses.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Express & Star and Shropshire Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
LIVE traffic updates
Road, rail and airport - latest
Our new, live traffic and travel updates service - check before you set out.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new E&S app
Download the Express & Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.

And the outcome of charging the Gas, Water and Power companies for digging up roads etc. would be… charges from those same utilities being levied upon us, the consumers!
This idea makes sense to prevent continuous traffic disruptions BUT can anyone see the Utilities absorbing the costs?
NO CHANCE!!! They will be passed on just like everything else is paased on and once again the consumer will have to pay up!
Report abuse
Who comes up with this one…. gas water power companys rip us all off as it is all they will do is past the buck to us !!!!!!!!!!!
Report abuse
it`s a good idea bad idea it will bake them to the work faster but we mite have to pay more for it
Report abuse
Why is it that they want it so they don’t clash. Wouldn’t it be better doing the whole lot once then resurface the road rather than have them dig up the road again straight after one has finished.
Anyone driving through Pelsall on the Wolverhampton road will know about the hundreds of tarmac patches in the road where it seems there has permanently been roadworks somewhere on the road for 10 years now.
Another example is lane head bridge in Willenhall where the road was dug up 12 hours after it had been open after resurfacing.
Report abuse
who applies for the Permit,”the client” or “the principal contractor carrying out the work”.”Who ever it is”,this will put even more pressure onto the work force to work faster, which will equal higher accident rate.(AFR).And i thought it was all about working safely these days…?
Report abuse
Nice one!
Allows councils to say ‘Your council is frozen this year. No increases. What good boys we are’…. And then they increase their income by applying charges to third parties who are used by everybody… and who then increase their charges to you to make up for their extra costs.
So in the end you have to fork out more just the same… AND most probably more than a council tax rise would have been as now we’ve got an intermediary and extra administrative costs to pay for!!!
RUBBISH!!!!
Report abuse