Blair: War was right – full stop
Friday 29th January 2010, 11:30AM GMT.
Tony Blair today told the Iraq Inquiry that taking Britain to war was “right – full stop”.
He said that the terrorist attacks on New York’s Twin Towers “dramatically” changed the threat posed by a “psychopathic” Saddam Hussein.
And he said: “I would not have done Iraq if I had not thought it was right. Full stop.”
In opening exchanges for his highly-anticipated evidence before the Chilcot inquiry he said September 11, 2001 had made him fear that Saddam could not be stopped from threatening other countries by existing United Nations sanctions.
Mr Blair said the 9/11 attacks on the United States completely transformed British policy towards Saddam and said he believed “beyond doubt” that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
He said: “I would fairly describe our policy up to September 11 as doing our best, hoping for the best but with a different calculus of risk assessment. “
He added: “The point about those acts in New York is that, had they been able to kill more people than the 3,000, they would have.”
He told the inquiry Iraq had shown “10 years of defiance “ and had to be brought “back into compliance “.
But he said the New York atrocities were key to the change in the “assessment” of the security risk.
“That completely changed our assessment of where the risks for security lay,” he said.
Mr Blair insisted that he kept his options for dealing with Iraq open before meeting George Bush at the US president’s ranch in Crawford, Texas, in April 2002 .
An “options paper” was drawn up in March 2002 which outlined the choices open to Britain for tackling Saddam, including continuing the current containment policy with “smart sanctions”, as well as regime change. Sir Christopher Meyer, the former British ambassador to Washington, previously told the inquiry that it appeared an agreement had been “signed in blood “ by Mr Blair and Mr Bush during the ranch meeting.
But Mr Blair responded: “I don’t think Christopher Meyer was ever at the critical meeting. “
Mr Blair was asked if he felt in 2002 that the link between terrorism and Iraq’s supposed WMD was a potential threat to the UK.
He replied: “Yes, because for the reasons that I have given. If Saddam, freed from sanctions, was able to pursue WMD programmes, I was very sure that at some point we were going to be involved in the consequences of that.” He added: “This is a profoundly wicked, I would say almost psychopathic, man. We were obviously worried that after him his two sons seemed to be as bad, if not worse.”
Mr Blair said Saddam Hussein had used weapons on mass destruction “not only on his own people but thousands in the Iran-Iraq war”.
He said Downing Street had not added the claim that Saddam could launch WMD in 45 minutes to the intelligence dossier that set out the case for war.
He accepted it had been a mistake not to make clear that the now-notorious claim that some WMD could be launched within 45 minutes referred to battlefield weapons and not long-range missiles.
Mr Blair said: “It’s a decision. And the decision I had to take was, given Saddam’s history, given his use of chemical weapons, given the over one million people whose deaths he had caused, given 10 years of breaking UN resolutions, could we take the risk of this man reconstituting his weapons programmes or is that a risk that it would be irresponsible to take? “
He went on: “I had to take the decision. I believed, and in the end the Cabinet believed – so did Parliament incidentally – that we were right not to run that risk. “
Arriving at the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre at 7.30am, two hours early, to give evidence the former prime minister avoided protesters, entering the inquiry venue by a cordoned off rear entrance.
There was fury among the demonstrators outside the conference centre that the former premier had not faced them as he arrived.
The inquiry has already heard evidence suggesting that he agreed to join the US-led invasion nearly a year before it began.
Alastair Campbell, the former prime minister’s communications director, said Mr Blair sent US President George Bush secret messages in 2002, assuring him that Britain would “be there “ if it came to military action.
There were also questions about his interview with TV presenter Fern Britton in which Mr Blair claimed it would have been right to remove Saddam Hussein even without WMD.
More than 3,000 members of the public applied for 80 places to see Mr Blair give evidence live in the inquiry chamber – 40 in the morning and 40 in the afternoon.
Twenty seats in the room were set aside for the families of service personnel who died in the Iraq conflict.
Business Awards
Book a Business Awards table
Join our celebrations of the region's best in business on Thursday March 22 - book your table now
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Express & Star and Shropshire Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases
OUR NEW APP
Get the new E&S app
Download the Express & Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.

I admit that I haven’t read the whole article, but what did Saddam have to do with 9/11?
If it was really all about WMDs (and not oil, for example), why not invade North Korea?
Report abuse
Er Kate, read the article then!
Report abuse
if we stood by how many more than a million would saddam of slaughtered ? And how long before the uk had an attack ? To many holier than thou pc do gooders im afraid its disgraceful that an ex pm is in this position …what next thather, churchill im ashamed to be british at times like this !
Report abuse
Saddam never killed anywhere close to 2 million Iraqis like we have killed since the invasion.
The UK has already had an attack on 7/7, sounds like you missed it, however not a single Iraqi was on any of the tubes on 7/7 or on any planes in 9/11.
Report abuse
Slippery and toad come to mind. The WMD and the enquiry into Dr Kelly’s death is to be closed for 70 years to protect Dr Kelly’s family. Rubbish that is to protect Bliar.
Report abuse
What Blair fails to mention about the weapons used by Saddam in the Iran – Iraq war is that it was the UK and USA amongst others like West Germany who supplied Saddam with the weapons when they were Saddams friends.
Report abuse
Saddam bit the hand that fed him. Invading Kuwait was his downfall. The UN should have allowed the coilition forces to have finished the job when they had the chance. Perhaps then this situation wouldn’t be as bad as you seem to think…Blame the UN
Report abuse
Brian you are wrong, we supplied weapons and technology to Saddam, he didn’t attack us, we attacked him, invaded his country and have left Iraq a bloodbath. You cannot go around the world arming people and then a few years later attack these people we arm because they cannot be trusted with the weapons we have sold them.
Report abuse
It is also interesting to note that when criminals are hanged in Iraq cf Chemical Ali nobody bats an eyelid.They find it quite normal.
In the European Union so loved by Mr Blair the average European MP would by in convulsions and frothing at the mouth at the application of hanging or any other method as a solutions to the avalanche of revolting crimes that have hit the place.And it goes far further than the UK.
Why?
Full stop.
Point.A la ligne. In French.
Report abuse
Bruce just as interesting as when criminals are executed in the USA.
Report abuse