Time to map out a plan for Villa's future
- Says blogger Matthew Turvey
The Public has hurt me architect admits
Wednesday 25th November 2009, 11:30AM GMT.
The award-winning architect behind controversial Black Country arts centre The Public today revealed the building had damaged his reputation.
Will Alsop admitted that mistakes made in the £72 million project had rubbed off on him.
But speaking to the Express & Star from Toronto, Canada, Mr Alsop said that he was confident that in a few years’ time the problems would all be forgotten, and that he was “looking forward tremendously” to giving a talk at the arts centre in West Bromwich on Friday.
Mr Alsop has in the past described the building as his best work, but it has been surrounded by controversy since costs spiralled and it failed to open on time.
The project, which is running £49m over budget, has been the subject of an audit report which revealed it should be mothballed, decommissioned or even demolished.
Sandwell Council is now in charge of the project after the Arts Council walked away earlier this year, handing the authority a final £3m of funding.
This Friday’s talk by the Stirling prize winner aims to give the audience an insight into the origins of some of The Public’s projects and artworks.
Mr Alsop said: “I’m looking forward to it tremendously. It is still, I think, a very important and wonderful project.
“I’ll be talking a little bit about the long history of this project. I was appointed in 1997, which is a long time ago.
“I want to go back and remind people where it came from, from my point of view, and say why I think it is a really important project.”
Mr Alsop also admitted he was expecting a grilling from some members of the audience on problems associated with the building.
“I’m sure there will be one or two [questions] and I’m quite happy to field those.”
Asked if he ever thought the building had harmed his reputation, he said: “Sometimes I do. There are all sorts of suggestions
“Anytime I read things about it the costs of the building always fluctuate. What I would appreciate is that that figure isn’t for the building, that is the total cost of the project and the whole cost of the building I would suspect is in the order of £30-£32m – under half of what is reported. That tends to reflect on me.”
Described as the biggest arts scandal for decades by shadow arts minister Ed Vaizey, The Public went into administration in 2006, having gone millions of pounds over budget, with chief executive Sylvia King forced out along with half of her staff.
Mr Alsop, who has previously said the demise of the building effectively began when Sylvia King had to go, said everything was going swimmingly at the centre before she spotted a hole in the project’s funding before it opened.
He said: “She had become a friend by this time and asked me what she should do. I said, ‘go back to the powers that be and say there was a £2-£3m hole over a two to three-year period’.
“At least there’s a bit of time to plan out a strategy to fill that hole.
“She did report it and that resulted in contractors being sent off site, lots of sackings and lots of nervousness. To send any builder that you have off site and then bring them back is one of the most expensive things that you can do. Some of what I consider their mistakes and their knee-jerk reaction does rub off on me.”
He is confident that in years to come the public will put the teething problems behind them and he hopes they will enjoy the building he envisioned.
“People in the end remember the building, the experience and if there is a good combination in four or five years time, assuming that it continues to be successful, everyone will forget all those teething problems, but they will always remember the building.”
The free talk is at 4.45pm on Friday. To reserve a place, call 0121 533 7161.
Business Awards
Read the full story here
Full coverage of awards celebrating the region's best businesses.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Express & Star and Shropshire Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
LIVE traffic updates
Road, rail and airport - latest
Our new, live traffic and travel updates service - check before you set out.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new E&S app
Download the Express & Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.
Yes Mr Alsop they will remember the building. How can they forget the monstrocity built on their doorstep!
Report abuse
What a waste of money a total eyesore if this is his “best work” he should quit and become a roadsweeper and try living in a real world….
Report abuse
If its as good as he says, why doesn’t he put money into the project to keep it going. I bet he will be all smiles and excuses at the meeting, pity he can’t take it with him when he leaves!
Report abuse
I agree it has hurt Mr Alsops reputation, but not half as much as it has hurt the tax payers pocket.
Report abuse
Someone was paid to design this ugly building. I would sue him for fraud. I wouldn’t use this in your portfolio mate, it is as disaster.
Report abuse
Sam, No. 2.
If you’re such an expert on architectural quality, why don’t you quit roadsweeping and become an architect?
Seriously, I don’t think the design is the problem but rather that the original concept and project delivery were flawed – that is not the responsibility of the architect but Sandwell Council.
If you paid £20 million quid for a VW Beetle it would be an outrage, but that would not mean that the Beetle is not an iconic design – just that the car cost far too much.
Report abuse
NO6-An iconic design???? An oblong building painted an awful colour? At least the VW Beetle had curves and a good design shape. Come on now let’s be serious!!
Report abuse
No 7.
It pushes the boundaries of what we a think a building should be, as did the Beetle which was nothing like any other 1930s car and was considered ugly by many who still expected cars to look like horseless chariots.
The Public building is not my taste, but only time will tell whether or not it will come to be an icon. In the Black Country our industrial heritage was once considered ugly, but what we have left is now seen by many as aesthetically pleasing and characteristic of the area – even sixties tower blocks are now finding their apologists.
Look at the affection Walsall folk have for their concrete hippo! Time will tell.
Report abuse
“the public has hurt me architect admits” no it hasn’t Will Alsop, like Sandwell Labour Councillors you did very well out of it, we are the ones who have been hurt, we paid for it!!!!!
We have had to take money off our families to give to Sandwell Council in the form of Council Tax, and for them then to use our money on building a monstrosity that was nothing more than an Ego Boosting Monstrosity, dedicated to the memory of Sandwell Labour Councillors Rule over the peasants, the same peasants who provide the money to pay their expenses
“I want to go back and remind people where it came from, from my point of view, and say why I think it is a really important project.”
How about this for an idea Will Alsop, you sit there and listen to the people who footed the bill for your disastrous monstrosity.
Jim of Bearwood.
Report abuse
AT THE END OF THE DAY IT IS JUST A HUGE BLACK RECTANGLE WITH WINDOWS SHAPED LIKE MR BLOBBY. PRETTY SIMILAR TO ANYTHING A FOUR YEAR OLD WOULD PRODUCE IF YOU ASKED THEM TO DESIGN A HOUSE IN NURSERY. NO WONDER MR ALSOP IS IN CANADA. ANOTHER WASTED OPPORTUNITY BY THE COUNCIL TO TACKLE DEPREVATION IN THE AREA. JUST THINK OF WHAT THE 72 MILLION COULD HAVE BEEN SPENT ON AND THE BENEFITS IT COULD HAVE GIVEN TO MANY. A LOCAL AND NATIONAL SCANDAL
Report abuse