Why the Net has the advantage in the ‘Undies world’
- Shopping blogger Emma Iannarilli
Children’s lunchboxes ‘too sugary’
Monday 16th November 2009, 10:54AM GMT.
Can’t see video? Update Adobe Flash Player
Video may take a moment to load.
Parents could be packing more than 12 teaspoons of sugar into their children’s lunch-boxes by giving them snacks designed for kids, says a consumer campaign group.
Which? assessed the nutritional content of items that fit into children’s lunch-boxes and found some were “full of salt and sugar”.
The Which? report found that one pack of Dairylea Lunchables Ham ‘n’ Cheese Crackers contained 1.8g of salt – more than half the recommended daily allowance of a four to six-year- old, and that a 200ml Robinsons Fruit Shoot orange juice drink contained 23g of sugar, which equals almost five teaspoons.
Which? is calling for robust rules on when products can make health and nutrition claims to help families pick out healthier food.
Which? magazine editor Martyn Hocking said: “Some products give the impression of being healthy but are full of salt and sugar.
“The best way to beat the lunch-box baddies is by checking the nutrition and ingredient information.
“We’d also like to see the rules on health and nutrition claims made tougher so that there’s less confusion on the supermarket shelves.”
Business Awards
Book a Business Awards table
Join our celebrations of the region's best in business on Thursday March 22 - book your table now
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Express & Star and Shropshire Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases
OUR NEW APP
Get the new E&S app
Download the Express & Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.
Maybe there should keep all high sugar and salt products under the counter or stop producing them.
It isn’t rocket sicence!
Report abuse
I am absolutely sick of being told what i can and cannot feed my own kids. I am an adult and can make an informed decision about what is good for them.
Report abuse
Yet again the “nanny state” must tell what to do…..well this week anyway… as it seems next week we will get a different message, just as we did this week now that we can all eat extra calories. D’ont blame the science that measures things.. blame the idiot who interpretates the data for their own purpose! Granny not “nanny” got it right… a LITTLE of what you fancy does you good.
Report abuse
What food is healthy? We are told one minute chocolate is bad for you. Then we are told it can help protect against cancer. They spend so much wasted time researching this stuff and for what? People who are fit have heart problems. People who dont smoke or drink have problems as well.
Its our way of life thats at fault. Lazy people too car dependant. Too much TV and computer games. I do agree that it’s not for the nanny state to decide. It’s up to parents to be responsible with their health and their childrens health.
Report abuse