Rail energy was wasted

Friday 10th October 2008, 8:16AM BST.

I see that there is a £253m gap in funding towards the extension of the Midland Metro.

As any railway fan will tell, we once had quite an extensive rail network in the Black Country. 

One could get to anywhere from these parts, without changing in many instances. 

Then the Beeching axe fell and many miles of track were closed down and lifted, leaving the trackbed to become overgrown and, eventually, to be built over.

If these closures had not taken place, or if the permanent way had been maintained, we would still have clearly defined routes along which the Metro could have run. 

The route from Wolverhampton via Priestfield could have been used, opening up areas to quick transportation. 

This is now impossible due to the fact that much building has taken place where the route once ran. 

It is a great pity that our Victorian ancestors spent so much energy and money building these railways, only to have them wasted by the modern businessmen who now control transport in this country.

The rebuilding of New Street station is a fine example of wastage. The powers-that-be tell us that the new station will be a landmark development, a credit to Birmingham, but they say nothing about increased traffic.

The reason why is simple. The station has two tracks in and two out on the main line, and tunnels are costly to build. Therefore, if they still keep to the existing tunnels, there is no way that the new station will safely handle extra services. So once again, facade and impression take front seat to customer service. Why not build a new station just outside of the city centre to share the load with the present New Street?

They spent a hell of a lot of money on the new Bull Ring, why not do the same with our railways and Metro?

The owners and developers, who are not railway men, haven’t a clue.

Cliff Millward, Sedgley Road West, Tipton.


  1. 1
    Martin Davies

    If they built it, would we travel enough on the lines to pay for it?
    Many of the old lines were shut because they were uneconomical. Who should pay? The users? Or the government subsidise the travel like they do banks?

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Marilyn Roebuck

    These lines are needed and should be subsided. France and Germany manage it so we should be able to do the same.

    Report abuse



Free e-Supplements

Business Awards

Read the full story here Read the full story here

Full coverage of awards celebrating the region's best businesses.

Lifestyle

Interactive Dining Out map Interactive Dining Out map

Hundreds of reviews by the Express & Star and Shropshire Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.

LIVE traffic updates

Road, rail and airport - latest Road, rail and airport - latest

Our new, live traffic and travel updates service - check before you set out.

OUR NEW APP

Get the new E&S app Get the new E&S app

Download the Express & Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.