Time to map out a plan for Villa's future
- Says blogger Matthew Turvey
Third of West Midlands universities to charge full tuition fees
Wednesday 6th April 2011, 11:29AM BST.
At least a third of all universities in the West Midlands will be charging students £9,000 a year from next year, with the rest due to make an announcement on fees in the next couple of weeks.
Birmingham, Warwick and Aston universities have decided that they will be charging the increased rate of £9,000. Wolverhampton, Staffordshire, Birmingham City, Keele and Worcester are due to announce how much they will set fees at over the next few weeks.
Coventry has said its fees will be between £4,600 and £9,000. All universities must submit their plans to the Office for Fair Access before the end of April.
It was revealed yesterday that Derby University will buck the trend of charging students £9,000 for next year by setting fees at less than £7,500 for the majority of courses.
Derby’s announcement will be a boost for the Government which has based its future funding of universities on the assumption most will charge around £7,500.
The majority of universities are sticking to around £9,000, with the most elite institutions leading the way.
Around 25 English universities have declared their intended fee levels for next year, with most planning to charge £9,000.
Universities planning to charge the maximum are Cambridge, Oxford, Imperial College London, University College London, Manchester, Essex, Leeds, Durham, Lancaster, Bath, Loughborough, Exeter, Sussex, Surrey, Liverpool and Liverpool John Moores, and those in the West Midlands.
Ministers have warned universities that if the majority set fees at, or close to £9,000, then more funding for teaching may be lost.
Liverpool Hope plans to charge less than £9,000, while Bishop Grosseteste University College Lincoln has said fees for the majority of its courses will be £7,500.
MPs voted to raise tuition fees to £6,000 from 2012 at the end of last year, with institutions allowed to charge up to £9,000 only in “exceptional circumstances”.
Business Awards
Read the full story here
Full coverage of awards celebrating the region's best businesses.
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Express & Star and Shropshire Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
LIVE traffic updates
Road, rail and airport - latest
Our new, live traffic and travel updates service - check before you set out.
OUR NEW APP
Get the new E&S app
Download the Express & Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.
Bankrupt our own system and discourage homegrown students while giving £650 million to improve Education in Pakistan. Great economics and foward planing…..NOT !
We then have the debacle of charging extortionate fees if a student tries to payback their loan early….something the Government have decried in the private sector.
Report abuse
tell it like it is, spot on! How much longer are we going to selfishly poach Doctors and Nurses from poorer, in some cases third world countries, who can ill afford to lose them in the first place, because its cheaper than training or own, in the short term at any rate?
Report abuse
Great comment Bob s..We can afford to give Pakistans education this money but not our own. Where are all the Tory Dem supporters now? Gone quiet, or have they their usual answer (Blame Labour) AH..Can’t blame Labour for this one. Torydems control the pot of money now! Its a disgrace for a government to make cut backs on its own people, even though they were needed, then to do this.
Report abuse
Where did that figure come from and where can I verify it ?
I agree with the concept that we do not give money to nucleur powers or countries that will spend the money on things other than humanitarian uses.
What I don’t get is where these figures we see so often in the press come from.
Report abuse
Directly take them to task for wasting ‘their’ time and ‘their’ money with some authority and confidence and they’ll never have30k+ at least of debt, at the point of leaving university, with 9% of income paid above £21,000. How are these people supposed to manage or even obtain a mortgage when they decide to try and buy a home? What a mess. They passed this blatant and politically motivated decision to claw back and dissuade applications to higher education far too easily claiming it had to be a ‘tough’ decision in face of the economy. The Russell Group and the Government had better hope to hell applications for university places outside their top 20 will drop significantly as they so desire otherwise they’re going to have to worry about the extra cash being forked out regarding the extra fees themselves (maybe even losing that extra 1/3 of H.E.F.C.E public funding the R.G already receive over everyone else?). The amusing thing to me is that Osborne has already implied recently that most graduates need not worry about paying back their fees since most of them won’t ever be earning above £21,000 when they leave, HAIL HOSANNAS! At this point I’d say to anyone who has a real desire and determination to go to university and improve themselves to look into the realities of the current situation and to not let it deter them if it’s really what they want.
Even if the economy were to be magically rejuvenated tomorrow, I doubt they would repeal these plans. It’s primarily an ideological step backwards in order to rarify higher education in order to limit anyone who has a desire to be educated.
Universities might somehow have diluted a sacred institution of higher academic education – as the Russell Group continuously imply whenever one of their ilk are grudgingly interviewed on Newsnight. I’d just fear the next step they’ll likely want to take toward the wholly inequitable system of fees being demanded upfront and competing private companies deciding who is eligible for the best universities regardless of merit and achievement. I anticipated with dread that there would be this change last summer simply because it was a predictable move regarding the character of a conservative government. I hope I’m wrong in fearing how further they’ll try and take this trend in 10 or 15 years time if they maintain power. I wouldn’t even give a hope Ed Milliband or any influence his ex troop such as Charles Clarke, the ex Secretary of State, would reverse it since the dirty work will have already been done for them.
Oh well, at least there will be no more room for certain feckless lecturers to fob off their students with a film or documentary vaguely related to their subject for a few hours while they catch up with marking papers. Students can d to listen to some rent-a-tory idiot dismissing them while claiming they are paying for ‘their’ education out of ‘their’ taxes ever again.
Report abuse