Half of AWM cash goes to the public sector
Tuesday 22nd June 2010, 11:30AM BST.
The taxpayer-funded quango that is meant to boost businesses in the West Midlands gave almost half its grants to the public sector, figures revealed today.
Advantage West Midlands awarded £133 million out of £281m, 47 per cent of its funding, to the public sector according to the Taxpayers Alliance.
It found that nationally £2.9 billion was awarded in grants by regional development agencies in 2007-08 and 2008-09. But around £1.8 billion was awarded to predominantly public sector organisations or projects in grants 62 per cent of the total.
AWM was founded in 1999 with a remit to help businesses, boost regeneration and help people get training for jobs.
One of the grants AWM made was £119,603 in “business support” to Regenco, the company that was meant to regenerate West Bromwich.
But it was shut down at the start of this year after all its funding was pulled and Sandwell Council took on the job alone.
AWM gave £4.6m to Wolverhampton City Council, £3.9m to Staffordshire County Council, £820,000 to Sandwell Council, £592,000 to Walsall Council, £389,000 to Stafford Borough Council, £18,500 to Lichfield and £7.7m to Dudley. The majority of grants to private companies were three figures or under.
Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the Taxpayers’ Alliance (TPA), said: “These quangos have claimed for years to be focused on business, but in reality the majority of their grants have been going to other bodies in the public sector.
“With a huge budget deficit, the Regional Development Agencies should be at the top of the list for abolition to save money.”
Will Harpur, spokesman for AWM, said: “The TPA statement is over simplistic.
“The majority of our investment provides work and contracts for private companies.
“Economic development is, by its nature, a partnership activity. Investments are made to a range of organisations which deliver complex developments in the most effective way.
“Public sector bodies often manage these developments and sub-contract work to the private sector.”
Business Awards
Book a Business Awards table
Join our celebrations of the region's best in business on Thursday March 22 - book your table now
Lifestyle
Interactive Dining Out map
Hundreds of reviews by the Express & Star and Shropshire Star's teams to help you decide where to eat.
entertainment
All the film reviews
Before you plan a trip to the pictures, get our critics' verdicts on all the latest movie releases
OUR NEW APP
Get the new E&S app
Download the Express & Star’s new app to your iPad or iPhone to get one week of access to our digital newspapers absolutely FREE.
In the interests of fairness, it would have helped to have a comment from someone who represents Advantage West Midlands.
Report abuse
If you look carefully there is a response from a spokesman for AWM but it is just meaningless corporate-speak twaddle, the kind that we have come to expect from these kind of organisations, so it is no surprise that you missed it.
Come on Dave, swing the axe
Report abuse
Too right. AWM should be immediately abolished!!!
Taxpayers have had enough of this waste!!!
Report abuse
This report is not objective is it, it doesn’t give us any info on what AWM has generated for the West Midlands. Where is the argument for the good AWM has done, funding projects which has resulted in jobs and/or homes boosting areas that need it – Bilston for example. Surely it is the private sector that build these homes and leisure facilities?!
Report abuse
I think that AWM funded that huge warehouse on the Black Country route in Bilston. It is 190,000 sq ft and has had no one in it since it was built two years ago. That does not seem a good idea to me.
Report abuse
You mean the one built by Citadel, a private sector company?!?!
Report abuse
AWM is a farce and a waste.
Report abuse
I like No.3 don’t know what AWM has done be it well or badly so could those asking for it to be abolished explain why it’s so bad? The comment by AWM makes perfect sense to me i.e. a lot of the projects are done as a partnership between the private and public sector therefore payments have to go to both how is this “corporate speak twaddle”
Report abuse